Decima del match del secolo, difesa pirc, quando le ciambelle non riescono con il buco

[Event “Let’s Play!”]
[Site “Chess.com”]
[Round “?”]
[White “homunculus1”]
[Black “enricof8”]
[Result “1-0”]
[ECO “B06”]
[WhiteElo “1861”]
[BlackElo “1791”]
[EndDate “2019.01.24”]

Prima partita del match: https://umbriawaydeveloper.wordpress.com/2019/01/19/il-match-del-secolo-per-il-titolo-di-campione-condominiale-globale-interplanetario-prima-del-match-huebsch-gambit-faraoni-enrico-vs-homunculus1-0-1/

Seconda :https://umbriawaypotenzia.wordpress.com/2019/01/20/seconda-del-match-mondiale-condominiale-vs-homunculus1-dopo-io-pensa-ma-qui-posizio-persa-micko-philidor-defence/

Terza: https://umbriawaytarget.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/il-match-del-secolo-condominiale-terza-del-match-gm-faraoncic-accorcia-le-distanze/

quarta: https://umbriawaynoir.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/quarto-turno-del-campionato-mondiale-elo-under-di-scacchi-patta-tra-due-supergm-condominiali/

quinta: https://umbriawayfocus.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/quinta-del-match-per-il-titolo-faraoncic-vs-homunculus1/

sesta: https://umbriawayfidelizza.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/sesta-del-mondiale-di-scacchi-seguito-anche-su-altair-4-gm-faraoncic-accorcia-le-distanze/

settima: https://umbriawaydeveloper.wordpress.com/2019/01/22/est-indiana-da-brivido-ora-puoi-limmortale-condominiale-gm-faraoncic-riagguanta-il-fuggitivo/

ottava: https://umbriawaydesign.wordpress.com/2019/01/23/il-match-del-secolo-riveduto-e-corretto-patta-definita-la-sempreinbianco-dai-critici-gm-faraoncic-riesce-a-salvarsi-con-pellegrinaggio-ad-assisi/

nona: https://umbriawaycultura.wordpress.com/2019/01/23/match-del-secolo-difesa-alekhine-la-nona/

punteggio dopo la game: 6 a 4 per homunculus1!

1.d4 g6 2.e4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.f4 Nf6

B09: Pirc Defense: Main Line, Austrian Attack, 4…Bg7

5.e5

5..dxe5 6.dxe5 Qxd1+ 7.Kxd1 Ng4 8.Nd5

8..Kd8 9.Ke1 c6 10.Nc3 f6

11.h3 Nh6 12.Nf3 Nd7 13.g4

13..Kc7 (-0.16 → +1.36)

Mistake. The best move was 13… fxe5 14.Ne4

14.Be3? (+1.44 → +0.10)

la linea 14. e6 Nc5 15.f5 gxf5 16.Bf4+ Kd8 17.Rd1+ Ke8 18.Bxh6 porta a un vantaggio netto

14…Nb6? (0.00 → +0.63)

Inaccuracy. A better move was 14… fxe5 15.fxe5 Nb6 16.Ng5 Bxe5 17.Be2 Bd7 18.Rd1 Rad8 19.Rf1

15.Bc5?! (+0.67 → -0.25)

Inaccuracy. A better move was 15. a4 Nf7 16.exf6 exf6 17.a5 Nd5 18.Nxd5+ cxd5 19.a6 b6

15…Nd7? (-0.33 → +1.54)

15…fxe5 16.Nxe5 Be6 17.Nd3 Nd7 18.Kd2 Nxc5 19.Nxc5 Bf7 20.Re1

16.Be3? (+1.87 → +0.37)

16.Bxe7 fxe5 17.Ng5 Re8 18.Ne6+ Kb6 19.b4 a6 20.Bc5+ Nxc5

16…Nb6 17.Kf2?! (+0.79 → +0.04)

17. a4!?

17…Nf7 18.exf6 exf6 19.Rd1 (+0.68 → 0.00)

Inaccuracy. A better move was 19. ♖e1 Nd6 20.f5 gxf5 21.Bf4 Bf8 22.gxf5 Bxf5 23.Nd4 Bd7

19…Rd8? (+0.14 → +1.10)

Inaccuracy. A better move was 19… f5 20.Bc5 Bd7 21.Kg3 Bxc3 22.bxc3 Ae6

20.Rxd8 Kxd8 21.Bd3 Bd7 22.Bd4 Ke7 23.Bc5+ Kd8 24.f5 g5? (+1.13 → +2.68)

24…gxf5

25.Re1 Ne5 26.Nxe5 fxe5 27.Ne4 h6? (+4.69 → +7.76)

relativamente meglio era 27…Nd5

28.f6 1-0

conclusioni: homunculus 1 prende il largo il nero non ha capito nulla di questa apertura